| bfol.mm Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > PE Home > Th. List > raa-P4 | |||
| Description: Reductio ad Absurdum.
This rule combines ndnegi-P3.3 168 with double negative elimination, and is thus dependent on the Law of Excluded Middle. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| raa-P4.1 | ⊢ ((𝛾 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓) |
| raa-P4.2 | ⊢ ((𝛾 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜓) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| raa-P4 | ⊢ (𝛾 → 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | raa-P4.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝛾 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓) | |
| 2 | raa-P4.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝛾 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜓) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | ndnegi-P3.3 168 | . 2 ⊢ (𝛾 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑) |
| 4 | 3 | dnege-P3.30 276 | 1 ⊢ (𝛾 → 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff objvar term class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wff-neg 9 → wff-imp 10 ∧ wff-and 132 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-L1 11 ax-L2 12 ax-L3 13 ax-MP 14 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi-D2.1 107 df-and-D2.2 133 df-or-D2.3 145 df-true-D2.4 155 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |