| bfol.mm Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > PE Home > Th. List > exiisub-P5 | |||
| Description: Existential Quantifier
Introduction Law with Implicit Substitution.
'𝑥' cannot occur in either '𝑡' or '𝜓'. This is the dual of specisub-P5 654. The hypothesis is fulfilled when every free occurence of '𝑥' in '𝜑' is replaced with the term '𝑡', and every bound occurence of '𝑥' is replaced with a fresh variable (one for each quantifier). The resulting WFF is '𝜓'. '𝑥' cannot occur in '𝑡' either, or it would occur in '𝜓' wherever '𝑥' was replaced. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| exiisub-P5.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| exiisub-P5 | ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | exiisub-P5.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | 1 | subneg-P3.39 323 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) |
| 3 | 2 | specisub-P5 654 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) |
| 4 | allnegex-P5 597 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | subiml2-P4.RC 541 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) |
| 6 | 5 | trnsp-P3.31d.RC 289 | 1 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff objvar term class |
| Syntax hints: term-obj 1 = wff-equals 6 ∀wff-forall 8 ¬ wff-neg 9 → wff-imp 10 ↔ wff-bi 104 ∃wff-exists 595 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-L1 11 ax-L2 12 ax-L3 13 ax-MP 14 ax-GEN 15 ax-L4 16 ax-L5 17 ax-L6 18 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi-D2.1 107 df-and-D2.2 133 df-or-D2.3 145 df-true-D2.4 155 df-rcp-AND3 161 df-exists-D5.1 596 |
| This theorem is referenced by: qremexv-P5 657 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |